​
What is Tree of Thoughts?

Tree of Thoughts (ToT) is an advanced prompting technique that enables AI models to explore multiple reasoning paths in parallel, evaluate their potential, and select the most promising branches to develop further—similar to how humans explore different solutions when tackling complex problems.

​
Why Use Tree of Thoughts?

  • Improved Problem-Solving: Systematically explore multiple solution pathways
  • Better Planning: Map out different approaches before committing to one
  • Enhanced Creativity: Generate diverse solutions to open-ended problems
  • Reduced Errors: Catch mistakes by comparing different reasoning branches
  • Complex Decision-Making: Break down complex decisions into evaluable components

​
Basic Implementation in Latitude

Here’s a simple Tree of Thoughts example for solving a complex problem: 
---
provider: OpenAI
model: gpt-4o
temperature: 0.3
---

# Tree of Thoughts Problem-Solving

Let's solve this problem by exploring multiple lines of reasoning:

**Problem**: {{ problem_statement }}

## Initial Thought Branches:

### Branch A: [First Approach]
1. Initial premise: ...
2. Reasoning step: ...
3. Intermediate conclusion: ...
4. Further implications: ...
5. Potential outcome: ...

### Branch B: [Alternative Approach]
1. Initial premise: ...
2. Reasoning step: ...
3. Intermediate conclusion: ...
4. Further implications: ...
5. Potential outcome: ...

### Branch C: [Creative Approach]
1. Initial premise: ...
2. Reasoning step: ...
3. Intermediate conclusion: ...
4. Further implications: ...
5. Potential outcome: ...

## Branch Evaluation:
- Branch A strength: ...
- Branch B strength: ...
- Branch C strength: ...

## Final Solution Path:
[Select most promising branch and develop it further]

​
Advanced Implementation with Parameters

---
provider: OpenAI
model: gpt-4.1
temperature: 0.4
---

# Tree of Thoughts: Advanced Problem-Solving

Let's solve this complex problem using a Tree of Thoughts approach with {{ thought_branches }} initial branches.

**Problem**: {{ problem_statement }}

## Thought Generation:

{{ for branch in thought_branches }}
  ### Branch {{branch}}: [Name this approach]

  {{ for level in levels}}
    **Level {{level}} thinking:**
    - [Reasoning steps at this level]
    - [Interim conclusions]

    **Branch {{branch}} Outcomes:**
    - [Describe expected outcomes of this reasoning path]
    {{ '\n\t'}}
  {{ endfor }}

  ## Branch Evaluation:

  {{ for criteria in evaluation_criteria}}
  ### Criterion: {{ criteria }}
    - Branch {{branch}}: [Score 1-10] - [Justification]
    {{ '\n'}}
  {{ endfor }}
{{endfor}}

## Solution Development:

{{ if branch_selection_method === "best_single" }}
  **Selected Branch**: [Identify best overall branch]
  **Development**: [Fully develop this single branch to conclusion]
{{ else if branch_selection_method === "hybrid" }}
  **Hybrid Solution**: [Combine elements from multiple branches]
  **Integration Points**: [Explain how different branch elements connect]
{{ else if branch_selection_method === "weighted" }}
  **Weighted Solution**: [Proportionally represent branches based on scores]
  **Weighting Factors**: [Explain the weights applied to each branch]
{{ endif }}

## Final Answer:
[Complete solution with justification]
You can use {{ '\n\t' }} to give indentation in the code block. Is more easy to follow what’s doing the prompt

​
Implementing ToT With Chains

Latitude’s chain feature allows for structured Tree of Thoughts reasoning:
chain
---
provider: OpenAI
model: gpt-4o
temperature: 0.4
---

# Tree of Thoughts with Chains

```markdown
<step>
# Step 1: Generate Multiple Thought Branches

**Problem**: {{ problem_statement }}

Let me generate three distinct approaches to solving this problem:

## Branch A: [First Approach]
1. Initial premise: ...
2. Reasoning: ...
3. Implications: ...

## Branch B: [Second Approach]
1. Initial premise: ...
2. Reasoning: ...
3. Implications: ...

## Branch C: [Third Approach]
1. Initial premise: ...
2. Reasoning: ...
3. Implications: ...
</step>

<step>
# Step 2: Evaluate Each Thought Branch

Evaluating the branches generated in previous step:

## Branch A Evaluation:
- Strengths: ...
- Weaknesses: ...
- Confidence score (1-10): ...

## Branch B Evaluation:
- Strengths: ...
- Weaknesses: ...
- Confidence score (1-10): ...

## Branch C Evaluation:
- Strengths: ...
- Weaknesses: ...
- Confidence score (1-10): ...
</step>

<step>
# Step 3: Select and Develop Best Branch

Based on my evaluation:

The most promising approach is **Branch [X]** because:
[Justification for selection]

Let me develop this branch further:

## Detailed Development:
1. [Further reasoning steps]
2. [Handling edge cases]
3. [Addressing potential objections]
4. [Additional insights]

## Final Solution:
[Complete answer to the original problem]
</step>

​
Multi-Agent ToT

Implement Tree of Thoughts with agent collaboration, you can play with it here. 
---
provider: OpenAI
model: gpt-4o
temperature: 0.3
type: agent
agents:
  - agents/creator
  - agents/critic
  - agents/synthesizer
---

# Multi-Agent Tree of Thoughts

Solve the following problem using a collaborative multi-agent Tree of Thoughts approach:

**Problem**: {{ problem_statement }}

## Process:
1. The **creator** agent will generate multiple solution branches
2. The **critic** agent will evaluate each branch's strengths and weaknesses
3. The **synthesizer** agent will select and refine the most promising approach

Let's begin solving this step by step.

​
Best Practices for Tree of Thoughts

​
Applications in Different Domains

---
provider: OpenAI
model: gpt-4o
temperature: 0.4
---

# Strategic Planning Tree of Thoughts

Let's evaluate different strategic approaches for {{ business_scenario }}:

## Branch 1: Market Expansion Strategy
1. **Current Market Analysis**: [Assessment of current position]
2. **Target Market Identification**: [New markets to enter]
3. **Entry Strategy**: [How to penetrate new markets]
4. **Resource Requirements**: [What's needed for execution]
5. **Risk Assessment**: [Potential challenges and mitigation]

## Branch 2: Product Innovation Strategy
1. **Current Product Evaluation**: [Assessment of product lineup]
2. **Innovation Opportunities**: [Areas for new development]
3. **R&D Framework**: [How to approach innovation]
4. **Go-to-Market Strategy**: [Bringing innovations to customers]
5. **Competitive Advantage Analysis**: [How this creates distinction]

## Branch 3: Operational Optimization Strategy
1. **Efficiency Assessment**: [Current operational bottlenecks]
2. **Process Redesign**: [New operational models]
3. **Technology Integration**: [Leveraging new technologies]
4. **Cost Structure Impact**: [Financial implications]
5. **Implementation Roadmap**: [Execution timeline and milestones]

## Strategy Evaluation:
[Comparative analysis of the three strategic paths]

## Recommended Approach:
[Final strategic recommendation with implementation plan]

​
Common Pitfalls and Solutions

Avoid These Common Mistakes:
  • Shallow Branches: Creating branches that aren’t meaningfully different from each other
  • Premature Evaluation: Judging branches before they’re fully developed
  • Confirmation Bias: Favoring branches that align with preconceptions
  • Neglecting Constraints: Failing to consider real-world limitations
  • Excessive Complexity: Creating too many branches or too much depth for the problem
Pro Tips:
  • Start with a clear problem statement before branching
  • Use different cognitive approaches for each branch (analytical, creative, critical)
  • Consider allocating more tokens to the most promising branches
  • Document your reasoning at each step for transparency
  • Try different branch-recombination methods for complex problems

​
Next Steps

Now that you understand Tree of Thoughts, explore these related techniques: